MANAGING ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT: HOW EDUCATION ENHANCES SELF-EFFICACY AND BUSINESS INTENTIONS
Keywords:
entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial education, business intention, GUESSSAbstract
Entrepreneurial education plays a strategic role in shaping students' motivation and ability to engage in future business creation, yet the mechanisms through which it influences entrepreneurial intention remain insufficiently explored. As entrepreneurship becomes a key catalyst of economic growth, innovation, and competitiveness, understanding how higher education programs translate learning experiences into business idea development and entrepreneurial action is increasingly important. Central to this discussion is the debate over whether entrepreneurship education primarily provides foundational business knowledge or fundamentally shapes students’ underlying psychological determinants—such as self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial ambition—that convert learning experiences into genuine business creation intentions.
This study investigates how entrepreneurial education contributes to business intention formation by examining its direct impact and its indirect effect through entrepreneurial self-efficacy. The research draws on insights from the GUESSS Project (Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students' Survey) and employs survey data collected from university students across three periods—2016 (N = 107), 2018 (N = 244), and 2021 (N = 99). Pearson correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships among entrepreneurial education, self-efficacy, and business intention.
Findings reveal consistently significant positive correlations among all constructs across all periods. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy emerges as the strongest predictor of business intention, explaining 28.3% of its variance in 2016 and increasing to 56.2% in 2018 and 2021. By contrast, the direct effect of entrepreneurial education on intention is modest and inconsistent, suggesting that its influence operates primarily through enhancing students’ confidence in their entrepreneurial abilities. These results confirm the hypothesis that entrepreneurial education strengthens the positive association between self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention.
Overall, the study underscores the central role of self-efficacy in managing entrepreneurial development and highlights the importance of experiential, skills-oriented educational approaches in fostering meaningful business intentions among university students. The findings provide practical implications for higher education institutions aiming to design entrepreneurship programs that not only teach business knowledge but also actively build students’ confidence and capability to launch ventures. Future research should explore longitudinal outcomes of such programs to determine their long-term impact on actual business creation and entrepreneurial success.
References
Anghelache, C., Anghel, M.-G., & Iacob, S. V. (2021). Economic and social development based on education, research and industry. MATEC Web of Conferences, 342. EDP Sciences.
Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton University Press.
Bird, B., & Schjoedt, L. (2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In Understanding the entrepreneurial mind (pp. 327–358).
Blessinger, P., Enakshi, S., & Makhanya, M. (2019). New higher education literacies for a sustainable future. University World News, October 19(571).
Chatterji, M. (1998). Tertiary education and economic growth. Regional Studies, 32, 349–354.
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295–316.
Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles (Rev. ed.). HarperBusiness.
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(2), 569–593.
Fiet, J. O. (2001). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00041-5
Hanushek, E. A. (2016). Will more higher education improve economic growth? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32, 538–552.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). Education and economic growth. Economics of Education, 60, 67.
Jung, D. I., Ehrlich, S. B., De Noble, A. F., & Baik, K. B. (2001). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and its relationship to entrepreneurial action: A comparative study between the US and Korea. Management International, 6(1), 41–53.
Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., & Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 439–453.
Krueger, N. F., Jr., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18(3), 91–104.
Lundström, A., & Stevenson, L. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice. Springer.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press.
Mitaseva, Z. (2022). Entrepreneurial education influence on the development of self-efficacy and personal competency. Knowledge – International Journal, 55(6), 1181–1185.
Mitaseva, Z. (2024). Transformative effect of entrepreneurial education in university learning programs on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Knowledge – International Journal, 62(2), 217–223.
Mitaseva, Z., & Tomovska-Misoska, A. (2024). Dynamic effect of entrepreneurial university environment on students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International May Conference on Strategic Management – IMCSM24, XX(1), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.5937/IMCSM24021M
Panait, M., Hysa, E., Petrescu, M. G., & Fu, H. (2022). Universities – Players in the race for sustainable development. In C. Machado & J. P. Davim (Eds.), Higher education for sustainable development goals (pp. 23–42). River Publishers.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Tomovska Misoska, A., Dimitrova, M., & Mrsik, J. (2016). Drivers of entrepreneurial intentions among business students in Macedonia. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 1062–1074.
Zahra, S. A., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouragement for new research in the development of intellectual capital. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 13–16.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.
