IATROGENIC INJURIES OF SUBVESICAL BILE DUCT - CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • Peter Markov Faculty of Medical Sciences, "Goce Delchev" University - Shtip, N. Macedonia
  • Alexander Mitevski Faculty of Medical Sciences, "Goce Delchev" University - Shtip, N. Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/kij5404589m

Keywords:

Laparoscopy, cholecystectomy, Iatrogenic injuries, Subvesical bile ducts, Classification systems

Abstract

With the rise of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the gold standard for treating gallbladder calculi and
polyps, subvesical bile ducts are gaining increased clinical importance. With the introduction of electrocautery in
surgery, a large part of these tubular structures, although with interrupted continuity, do not show extravasation of
bile content postoperatively. Decreased bile production during general anesthesia and increased intraperitoneal
pressure also make diagnosis of injuries difficult. Surgeons who frequently operate in the right upper quadrant have
to understand the anatomy of the biliary tree and its tendency for structural variation. The work of laparoscopic
surgeons should be conceptualized around three main goals: to enable safe identification of key anatomical
structures, usually by providing a critical point of safety (Critical View of Safety), to make a decision at the right
moment not to proceed with laparoscopic surgery when working conditions become too dangerous and there is no
possibility of identification of structures and to end the laparoscopic surgery with subtotal cholecystectomy when
identification of structures is impossible. Controversy among authors on the naming of the various subvesical
structures causes confusion in their identification and description. In order to overcome these challenges, there was a
need to establish classification systems for post-cholecystectomy lesions of the biliary tract. But due to the
individual shortcomings of all these systems, in June 2011, during the 19th meeting of the European Association for
Endoscopic Surgery in Turin, Italy, a conference was held to reach a consensus to establish a uniform classification
of iatrogenic bile duct injuries that will have two primary goals: first, to take into account changes in the type of
injuries with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and second, to combine all existing classification
systems and integrate them into one, universally accepted classification system. As part of the new inclusive
classification system for iatrogenic injuries of the biliary ducts, the following systems are considered: Bismuth,
Strasberg et al., McMahon et al., AMA, Neuhaus et al., Csendes et al., Steward et al., Hanover, Lau and Lai ,
Siewert et al., Cannon et al., Kapoor., Sandha et al.. In the new system a total of fifteen classifications are
incorporated using semantic connotations and grouped into three categories that will allow easy memorization by
surgeons. A (anatomy) for anatomy, To (time of) for time/moment of observation and M (mechanism) for the
mechanism of occurrence of the injury. By enabling a more precise classification of each of the injuries, the surgical
community will have the opportunity to develop recommendations for prevention, treatment and prognosis for their
outcome.

References

Albasini, J.L.A., Aledo, V.S., Dexter, S.P.L., Marton, J., Martin, I.J., & McMahon, M.J. (1995). Bile leakage following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 9:274,

Bacha, E.A., Stieber, A.C., Galloway, J.R., & Hunter, J.C.(1994). Non-biliary complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 344:896,

Bergman, J.J., van den Brink, G.R., Rauws, E.A.J., deWit, L.,Obertop, H, Huibregtse, K., Tytgat, G.N., & Gouma, D.J.(1996). Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 38:141,

Bismuth, H., & Lazorthes, F. (1981) Les traumatismes operatoires de la voie biliare principale. Paris, France: Masson.

Brooks, D.C., Becker, J.M., Connors, P.J., & Carr-Locke, D.L. (1993). Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg.Endosc. 7:292,

Champetier, J., L6toublon, C., Alnaasan, I., & Charvin, B. (1991). The cystohepatic ducts: surgical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 13: 203-211

Chartrand-Lefebvre, C., Dufresne, M-P., Lafortune, M., et al. (1994). Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct: A working classification for radiologists. Radiology; 193:523.

Chartrand-Lefebvre, C., Dufresne, M-P., Lafortune, M., et al. (1994). Iatrogenic injury to the bile duct: A working classification for radiologists. Radiology; 193:523.

Chuang, S.H., Hung, M.C., Huang, S.W. et al. (2018). Single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in 101 consecutive patients: choledochotomy, transcystic, and transfistulous approaches. Surg Endosc 32, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5658-y

Eikermann, M., Siegel, R., Broeders, I., et al. (2012). Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 26, 3003–3039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2511-1

Fingerhut, A., Dziri, C., Garden, O.J. et al. (2013). ATOM, the all-inclusive, nominal EAES classification of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27, 4608–4619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3081-6

Goor, D.A., & Ebert, P.A. (1972). Anomalies of the biliary tree: reportof a repair of an accessory bile duct and review of the literature. Arch Surg 104:302-309

Gurbuz, A.T., Watson, D., & Fenoglio, M.E. (1999). Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy. Am. Surg. 65:3212,

Haidar, H., Manasa, E., Yassin, K. et al. (2021). Endoscopic treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile leaks: a tertiary center experience. Surg Endosc 35, 1088–1092 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07472-0

Halpert, B. (1927). Morphological studies on the gallbladder. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1927;41:77–103.

Kitami, M., Murakami, G., Suzuki, D., Takase, K., Tsuboi, M., Saito, H., & Takahashi, S. (2005). Heterogeneity of subvesical ducts or the ducts of Luschka: a study using drip-infusion cholangiography-computed tomography in patients and cadaver specimens. World J Surg;29:217-223.

Luschka, H. (1863). Die Anatomie des Menschen in Rücksicht auf dieBedürfnisse der praktischen Heilkunde bearbeitet. Die Anatomie des menschlichen Bauches. Tübingen: Laupp;2(1):235-263.

Ma, Z., Zhou, J., Yao, L. et al. (2022). Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review. Surg Endosc 36, 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1

MacFayden, B.V., Vecchio, R., Ricardo, A.E., Mathis, C.R. (1998). Bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 12:315

McQuiUan, T., Manolas, S.G., Hayman, J.A., & Kune, G.A. (1989). Surgical significance of the bile duct of Luschka. Br J Surg 76:696-698

Misra, M., Schiff, J., Rendon, G., Rothschild, J., & Schwaitzberg, S. (2005). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect? Surg Endosc;19:1266–1271.

Mukesh, N., Zubin, D.S., Mahesh, G., & Rajesh, P. (2020). Bile Duct Injury—Classification and Prevention CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy; 11(03): 182-186 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709949

Nassar, A.H.M., Ng, H.J., Ahmed, Z. et al. (2021). Optimising the outcomes of index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration for biliary emergencies: a service model. Surg Endosc 35, 4192–4199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07900-1

Pollack, E.L., & Tabrisky, J. (1973). The aberrant divisional bile duct: a surgical hazard. Surgery 73:234-239

Robertson, A.J., Rela, M., Karani, J., Steger, A.C., Benjamin, I.S., & Heaton, N.D.( 1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy injury: an unusual indication for liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 11:449,

Richardson, M.C., Bell, G., & Fullarton, G.M. (1996). West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group: Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5,913 cases. Br. J. Surg. 83:1356

Sergi, C., Adam, S., Kahl, P., & Otto, H.F. (2000). The remodeling of the primitive human biliary system. Early Hum Dev;58:167–178.

Spanos, C.P., & Syrakos, T. (2006 Sep) Bile leaks from the duct of Luschka (subvesical duct): a review. Langenbecks Arch Surg;391(5):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0078-9. Epub 2006 Aug 23. PMID: 16927110.

Spanos, C.P., & Spanos, M.P. (2019). Subvesical bile duct and the importance of the critical view of safety: Report of a case. Int J Surg Case Rep.;60:13-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 28. PMID: 31185452; PMCID: PMC6556824.

Strasberg, S.M. (2019). A three-step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences Volume 26, Issue 4 p. 123-127. 04 March 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.616

Strasberg, S.M., Hertl, M., & Soper, N.J. (1995). An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg; 180:101.

Strasberg, S.M., Hertl, M., & Soper, N.J. (1995). An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 180:101,

Strasberg, S.M., Hertl, M., Soper, N.J. (1995). An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg.180:101, 2,3,13,25

Stokes, T.L., & Old, L. (1978). Cholecystohepatic duct. Am J Surg 135:703-705.

Thompson, R.W., & Schuler, J.G. (1986). Bile peritonitis from a cholecystohepaticbile ductule: an unusual complication of cholecystectomy. Surgery 99:511-513

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Markov, P., & Mitevski, A. (2022). IATROGENIC INJURIES OF SUBVESICAL BILE DUCT - CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 54(4), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.35120/kij5404589m