COMPARISON OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPS: CHATGPT AND IBM WATSON
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, IBM Watson, Natural Language Processing, Machine Learning, Data Analytics, Ethical AI, Industry ApplicationsAbstract
This paper embarks on a comprehensive and in-depth comparative analysis of two prominent artificial intelligence applications: ChatGPT and IBM Watson. Developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT excels in natural language processing, leveraging cutting-edge technology to enable robust conversational interfaces. In contrast, IBM Watson offers a multifaceted suite of AI services that encompass machine learning, advanced data analytics, and sophisticated language processing capabilities. This analysis delves into their intricate technical specifications, exploring the nuances of their respective architectures and computational frameworks. It meticulously evaluates their diverse capabilities, ranging from text generation and comprehension to complex data analysis and predictive modeling. Moreover, the paper critically examines the industry-specific use cases where ChatGPT and IBM Watson demonstrate their strengths and applications. By highlighting real-world examples across various sectors such as healthcare, finance, customer service, and education, it elucidates how each platform can be leveraged to enhance operational efficiency, decision-making processes, and user interaction experiences. Additionally, the analysis forecasts emerging trends in AI development, shedding light on how these technologies are expected to evolve and integrate into broader technological landscapes
References
Binns, R., Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Brown, T. B., et all. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2005. 14165.
Gibney, E. (2020). The Quantum Gold Rush. Nature, 574(7779), pp22-24.
Mitchell, M., et all. (2021). Model Cards for Model Reporting. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), pp81-90.
Narang, P., et all. (2021). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574(7779), pp505-510.
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 1(8).
Radziwill, N. M., & Benton, M. C. (2017). Evaluating quality of chatbots and intelligent conversational agents. Software Quality Professional, 19(3), pp25-36.
Somashekhar, S. P., Sepucha, K., Wallace, E., & Yenesew, M. (2018). Oncology: Cognitive computing in cancer care. IEEE Pulse, 9(1), pp8-13.
Smith, T. E., & West, R. (2020). AI in Education: Learning analytics and student data privacy. Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), pp117-126.
