THE ISSUE OF „DOUBLE MATERIALITY“ IN THE CONTEXT OF ENTITY’S SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Keywords:
sustainability, standards, dual materiality, factors, impactAbstract
The relevance of the issue of “double materiality” is determined by the fact that it is a key approach in the European Union strategy for sustainable development of entities and for sustainability management and reporting. The role of “double materiality” is crucial for its application in accordance with the new regulatory requirements. The European Commission published a final regulation to supplement the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) applicable in the European Union Member States. This regulation has been enforced since 5 January 2023. At the same time, the European sustainability standards are applied by all entities falling within the scope of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. The importance of “double materiality” is also crucial for the formation of the business strategy and disclosure of sustainability issues and its aspects in the entity’s sustainability report. It must be highlighted according to CSRD (article 1 (4) and (7), recital 57), disclosure of sustainability issues is part of the management report, which is a component of the entity’s financial statements.
The object reviewed in this publication is the issue of “double materiality” as a system, and in this respect, in the unity of its two elements in the context of entity’s sustainable development. The first element of “double materiality” is formed with view of the entity’s impact on the environment and/or on people, and the second one – with view of the impact of current or future effects of sustainability issues and requirements on cash flows, financial performance, financial position, financial stability, financial equilibrium, development and performance of the entity on the market, being characterized with a level of entropy, both in short- and in long-term aspect. The article studies the two elements of “double materiality” described above, not only within their interrelations and dependencies, but within their relative self-dependence and independence as well.
The publication focuses on the identification and integration of ESG risks arising from social, environmental and governance aspects of sustainability within the general system for risk analysis, control and management.
References
Велковска М. (2014). Устойчивост – понятие и употреба, СУ Св. “Климент Охридски“, т.1, с.80-93
(Velkovska M. (2014). Sustainability – concept and application, Sofia University St. “Kliment Ohridski”, vol. 1, pp. 80-93)
Иванов, И. (2015). Нашето общо бъдеще, превод от английски език (1989), изд. Книжен тигър, https://www.papertiger-bg.com/Foreword_Brundtland.pdf
(Ivanov, I. (2015). Our common future, translated from English (1989), Book Tiger Publishing House, https://www.papertiger-bg.com/Foreword_Brundtland.pdf)
Иванова, Р., Чуков, К. (2022). Финансово-стопански анализ, ИК-УНСС, С.
(Ivanova, R., Chukov, K. (2022). Financial and economic analysis, IC-UNWE, S.)
Natchkova, M. (2024). Specific disclosures in the pension fund sustainability report, 17 conference „Vanguard scientific instruments in management”, 10 – 15 September 2024, Ravda, Bulgaria, http://vsim-conf.info
(Natchkova, M. (2024). Specific disclosures in the pension fund sustainability report, 17 conference “Vanguard scientific instruments in management”, 10 – 15 September 2024, Ravda, Bulgaria, http://vsim-conf.info
Начкова, М. (2024). Счетоводно отчитане и оповестяване на социалните разходи, възникнали в резултат от прилагани социални политики от предприятията в отчета за устойчивостта, ел. Списание на ИДЕС, бр.4, https://www.ides.bg/media/2155/04-2024-maya-nachkova.pdf
Natchkova, M. (2024). Accounting and Disclosure of Social Expenditures Arising as a Result of Social Policies Implemented by Enterprises in the Sustainability Report, e-Journal of IDES, Issue 4, https://www.ides.bg/media/2155/04-2024-maya-nachkova.pdf)
Фесчиян, Д. (2023). За необходимостта от стандартизирани финансови отчети в публичния сектор, ел. списание на ИДЕС, бр. 2.
(Feschiyan, D. (2023). On the Need for Standardized Financial Statements in the Public Sector, e-Journal of IDES, Issue 2.)
Христов, В. (2022). Съществеността в контекста на приложимите в Република България Закон за счетоводството и Национални счетоводни стандарти, ел. списание на ИДЕС, бр.1, https://www.ides.bg/e-journal/2022/issue-1/01-2022-vladimir-hristov
(Hristov, V. (2022). Materiality in the Context of the Accounting Law and National Accounting Standards Applicable in the Republic of Bulgaria, e-Journal of IDES, Issue 1, https://www.ides.bg/e-journal/2022/issue-1/01-2022-vladimir-hristov)
Hartman, М. (2023). Укрепване на доверието и увереността: IAASB предлага нов стандарт за изразяване на сигурност относно информацията за устойчивостта, IFAC, ел. списание на ИДЕС, бр. 2/2023 г., https://www.ides.bg/media/2069/02-2023-ifac.pdf
(Hartman, M. (2023). Strengthening Trust and Confidence: IAASB Proposes New Standard for Assurance of Sustainability Information, IFAC, IDES e-Magazine, Issue 2/2023, https://www.ides.bg/media/2069/02-2023-ifac.pdf)
МСС1. (2019). (изм. - регламент (ЕС) № 475/2012, ов l 146, 06/06/2012, регламент (ЕО) № 2016/2067, ОВ l 323, 29/11/2016, регламент (ЕС) 2019/2075, ОВ l 316, 06/12/2019, регламент (ЕС) 2019/2104, ОВ l 318, 10/12/2019, регламент (ЕС) 2022/357, ОВ l 68, 03/03/2022, https://audit-bg.com/wp-content/uploads/dokumenti/MSS1.pdf
(IAS1. (2019). (amend. - regulation (EU) No. 475/2012, OJ l 146, 06/06/2012, regulation (EC) No. 2016/2067, OJ l 323, 29/11/2016, regulation (EU) 2019/2075, OJ l 316, 06/12/2019, regulation (EU) 2019/2104, OJ l 318, 10/12/2019, regulation (EU) 2022/357, OJ l 68, 03/03/2022, https://audit-bg.com/wp-content/uploads/dokumenti/MSS1.pdf)
