POTENTIAL BARRIERS FOR MILITARY MODERNIZATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN THE UPCOMING EUROPEAN REARMING EFFORTS
Keywords:
military modernization, transfer of technology, barriers of transferAbstract
As of now Europe is on track to drastically boost military capabilities through modernizing and expanding their portfolio (Politico, 2025). The demand for new technologies is driving technology transfers between domestic and foreign defense enterprises—a goal pursued by many nations (Ankit, 2024).The global security landscape in the recent years has been increasingly marked by contradiction, uncertainty, and volatility, with unpredictable risks and threats (EEAS, 2023). Humanity is currently grappling with the negative consequences of globalization, encountering serious challenges and dangers. As a result, new military alliances are forming on the world stage (EDIDP, 2024), accompanied by the expansion of defense industries in various countries, underscoring the need for future transfers of military technology (Vergun, 2023). Additionally, most militaries must adopt a data-driven approach and embrace digital transformation to effectively respond to great power competition and prevail in larger-scale conflicts. However, some countries are experiencing manufacturing challenges in meeting national demand due to ongoing global conflicts and their reliance on foreign suppliers (GAO, 2024). One of NATO's (2023) three primary objectives for 2030 is to enhance understanding which, based on their strategic approach and involves "leveraging innovation and connectivity between Nations, Academia, and Industry." Currently, as the European Union plans to unveil €800bn to “rearm” their Ministries of Defense (The Guardian, 2025), technology transfer is essential not only to keep pace with new technologies but also to adapt proven products to achieve supply independence from foreign powers outside of the EU. This creates new opportunities for scientific exploration and debate, emphasizing the importance of this publication. The central research question is what constitutes technology transfer and how it can be effectively executed between defense industry enterprises to achieve military modernization. This study will examine the process of acquiring technology from foreign providers to identify potential barriers companies may encounter. The publication's goal is to investigate the theoretical foundations of technology transfer, with key factors identified as critical to a successful transfer: a clear definition of the transfer, transfer barriers, desorptive capacity, management stability, cultural influences, time frames and legal considerations. Future work will analyze the current state and challenges of technology transfer, along with strategic solutions for its effective implementation. Given the space constraints of this publication, the primary focus will be on theoretical foundations, paving the way for a more detailed analysis in subsequent work.
References
Ankit, K. (2024). Indian Army's year of technological advancement in 2024. ORF. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/indian-army-s-year-of-technological-advancement-in-2024
Army Digital Transformation Strategy. (2021). Headquarters, Department of the US Army. Retrieved from https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/10/20/3b64248b/army-digital-transformation-strategy.pdf
Barrett, P., & Sexton, M. (1999). The transmission of out-of-industry knowledge into pharmaceutical industry wisdom. In Linking pharmaceutical research and innovation in other sectors, Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation Strategy Panel. London.
Barrett, P., & Sexton, M. (2003). A literature synthesis of innovation in small construction firms: Insights, ambiguities, and questions. The Technology Transfer System.
Buzan, B. (1987). An introduction to strategic studies: Military technology and international politics. Studies in International Security (SIS).
Loo, B. F. W. (2020). The challenges facing 21st-century military modernization. National Defense University Press. Retrieved from https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2054165/the-challenges-facing-21st-century-military-modernization/
Blakeney, M. (1989). Legal aspects of technology transfer to developing countries. Oxford: ESC Publishing.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 772/2004 of 27 April 2004 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of technology transfer agreements. Article 1.
Gouré, D. (2018, October 4). Winning future wars: Modernization and a 21st century defense industrial base. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/topical-essays/winning-future-wars-modernization-and-21st-century-defense
Davis, J. L., & Harrison, S. S. (2001). Edison in the boardroom: How leading companies realize value from their intellectual assets. John Wiley & Sons.
Defense News. (2024, September 9). EU buys too much defense equipment abroad, especially from the U.S., report says. Defense News. Retrieved from https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2024/09/09/eu-buys-too-much-defense-equipment-abroad-especially-from-us-report/
Defence Industry. (2024, September 8). EU’s reliance on foreign defense equipment and lack of investment in joint military projects highlighted. Defence Industry News. Retrieved from https://defence-industry.eu/eus-reliance-on-foreign-defence-equipment-and-lack-of-investment-in-joint-military-projects-highlighted-in-draghis-report/
European Defence Industrial Development Programme. (2024). European Commission. Retrieved from https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/european-defence-industrial-development-programme-edidp_en
Gilbert, M., & Cordey-Hayes, M. (1996). Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation. Technovation, 16(6), 301–312.
Kamara, H. M. (2023). Tenets of army modernization. Association of United States Army. Retrieved from https://www.ausa.org/publications/tenets-army-modernization
Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822-846.
Levin, M. (1997). Technology transfer is organizational development: An investigation into the relationship between technology transfer and organizational change. International Journal of Technology Management, 14(2-4), 297–308.
Strategic Communication Editorial Team. (2023). EU peace, security and defence. European External Action Service. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/taxonomy/term/400164_en
Santikarn, M. (1981). Technology transfer. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Sung, T. K., & Gibson, D. V. (2000). Knowledge and technology transfer: Levels and key factors. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Brazil, August.
The Guardian. (2025, March 4). EU chief unveils €800bn plan to ‘rearm’ Europe. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/04/eu-plan-to-bolster-europes-defences-could-raise-800bn-for-ukraine?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Delzo, P. E. V. (2019). Peruvian army, military transformation, effort and institutional commitment. Army University Press. Retrieved from https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/November-December-2019/Delzo-Military-Transformation/
Politico. (2025, March 11). EU considers giving countries wiggle room to boost defense spending. Politico. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-commission-expanding-definition-defense-spending/
Rivette, K. G., & Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the hidden value of patents. Harvard Business School Press.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
Vergun, D. (2023). DOD modernization relies on rapidly leveraging commercial technology. Defense.gov. Retrieved from https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3277453/dod-modernization-relies-on-rapidly-leveraging-commercial-technology/
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2024). Army modernization: Actions needed to support fielding new equipment. GAO. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-107566
NATO. (2023). Ongoing military transformation, leading to NATO 2030 – Multi-domain operations, deterrence and defence, improved understanding. NATO ACT. Retrieved from https://www.act.nato.int/article/ongoing-military-transformation-leading-to-nato-2030-multi-domain-operations-deterrence-and-defence-improved-understanding/
France24. (2024, September 9). The EU buys too much defense equipment from abroad, report says. France24. Retrieved from https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240909-the-eu-buys-too-much-defence-equipment-from-abroad-report-says
ASD Europe. (2024, September 9). The costs of relying on non-European defense suppliers. ASD Europe. Retrieved from https://www.asd-europe.org/our-industry/defence/the-costs-of-relying-on-non-european-defence-suppliers
Associated Press. (2025, March 11). EU chief says member countries must use a new defense loan to buy European, not American. Associated Press. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/8cbd54ba81c086aa8e47ea3a0971febb
Financial Times. (2025, March 8). Why Poland is still pushing for more EU-wide defense funding ideas. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/97e1d8ed-8fd6-4919-99d4-9ddf1a47f623
Reuters. (2025, March 11). EU ministers explore ways to spend on defense without breaking EU rules. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-ministers-explore-ways-spend-defence-without-breaking-eu-rules-2025-03-11/
