IMPACT OF SENSORY FOOD CHARACTERISTIC ON ОVERALL CONSUMERS’ SATISFACTION: TESTING A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL

Authors

  • Dushica Popova Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia
  • Natasha Miteva Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia

Keywords:

food, sensor characteristics, satisfaction, SEM

Abstract

Subject of research of this paper is the influence that food sensor characteristics have on the overall consumers’ satisfaction. A statistically significant difference and direct impact was confirmed on taste, aroma, appearance and texture of the food on the satisfaction of consumers of the service. The analysis included a total of 185 completely filled questionnaires which were further statistically processed. The sensor characteristics of the food were measured through taste, aroma, appearance and texture with total of 16 attributes, and the overall satisfaction with three attributes. Furthermore, the validity of the questionnaire was confirmed with the value of Cronbach alfa coefficient of 0.892. for the total structure of the model. Structuring equation modeling was used to determine the impact of the food sensor characteristics on satisfaction of service consumers and with that method the strength of the relationship between the variables was examined. Moreover, the weighted ration was determined with a value from 0 to 1. Additionally, the research showed that there is a significant influence from sensor characteristic on overal customers’ satisfaction with a composite reliability (CR) greater than 0.6, and average variability (AVE) over 0.6. All regression coefficients (β) of the attributes are statistically important with a value over 0.6, and the most of the with values over 0.7. The average variability (AVE) which expresses the share of the determinants variance connected with their latent variable (constructor), for the construct “sensor characteristics” as well as for the construct “overal satisfaction” is with a value from 0.81 to 0.8. Also, according to the obtained data from SEM method it is confirmed that the sensor characteristics (taste, aroma, appearance and texture) of the food have direct statistically significant influence on the overal customers’ satisfaction with a significant regression coefficient of β 0.76.

References

Andersen, V. B. & Hyldig, G. (2015). Consumers’ view on determinants to food satisfaction. A qualitative approach, 95, 9-16.

Bollen, К. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York.

Byrne, B. & Cahyono, S. (2022). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS. Taylor and Francis Group.

Civille, V.G. (1991). Food Quality: Consumer acceptance and sensory attributes. Journal of Food Quality, 14(1), 1-8.

Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson, New York.

Halmi, A. (2003). Multivarijatna analiza u društvenim znanstoima. Alinea, Zagreb.

Heldman, D.R. (2004). Identifying food science and technology research needs. Food Technology, 58, 32-34.

Iannario, M., Manisera, M., Piccolo, D. , Manisera, M. & Zuccolotto, P. (2017). Sensory analysis in the food industry as a tool for marketing decisions. Adv Data Anal Classif, 6(4), 303–321.

Imtiyaaz, H., Soni, P. & Yukongdi, V. (2021). Role of Sensory Appeal, Nutritional Quality, Safety and Health Determinants on Convenience Food Choice in an Academic Environment. Foods 2021, 10(2), 1-17.

Ketkaew, C., Wongthahan, P. & Sae-eaw, A. (2021). How sauce color affects consumer emotional response and purchase intention: a structural equation modeling approach for sensory analysis. British Food Journal, 123(6), 2152-2169.

Rex, B. K. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 5th Edition, The Guilford Press.

Sharif, M. K., Butt, M. S., Sharif, H. R. & Nasir, M. (2017). Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Acceptability. Handbook of food science and technology, 362–386.

Sinesio, F., Saba, A., Peparaio, M., Civitelli, E.S., Paoletti, F., & Moneta, E. (2018). Capturing consumer perception of vegetable freshness in a simulated real-life taste situation. Food Research International, 105, 764-771.

Vadiveloo, M., Morwitz, V., &Chandon, P. (2013). The interplay of health claims and taste importance on food consumption and self-reported satiety. Appetite, 71, 349–356.

Wang, C., Li, Y., Luo, X., Fu, H., Ye, Z. & Deng, G. (2022). How Are Consumers Affected by Taste and Hygiene Ratings When Ordering Food Online? A Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Study. Front Neurosci, 16, 1-12.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

How to Cite

Popova, D., & Miteva, N. (2025). IMPACT OF SENSORY FOOD CHARACTERISTIC ON ОVERALL CONSUMERS’ SATISFACTION: TESTING A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 69(3), 613–617. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/7279