CONTAMINATION OF DENTAL IMPLANTS AS A FACTOR IN THE SUCCESS/FAILUIRE OF THE IMPLANTATION PROCESS
Keywords:
dental implant, chemical elements, contamination, osseointegration, peri-implantitisAbstract
Titanium is widely regarded as the most biocompatible noble metal, demonstrating excellent affinity with bone tissue and supporting the process of osseointegration, which is critical for the success of dental implant procedures. Most dental implant manufacturers report a 99% success rate and claim their implants are composed of 99% titanium. However, the remaining 1% of the material composition often remains unspecified, raising questions about its potential impact on clinical outcomes.
Aim: Despite extensive research in dental implantology, implant failure still occurs, frequently due to peri-implantitis — an inflammatory process that can lead to implant loss.
Methods: This study aimed to investigate the surface composition of dental implants from various manufacturers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and to assess the potential role of surface contaminants in the osseointegration process.
Results and conclusions: Our findings indicate that, in addition to titanium, several chemical elements were present on the implant surfaces, including silicon, chlorine, zinc, calcium, phosphorus, sulfur, and sodium. These elements may originate from manufacturing, handling, or packaging processes, and their presence may influence the biological response to the implant, either positively or negatively. Depending on their concentration and interaction with host tissues, such elements could enhance osseointegration or contribute to inflammatory reactions and implant failure.This study underscores the importance of surface purity and composition in dental implants and highlights the need for further investigation into the clinical relevance of surface contaminants.
References
Battaglino, R., Fu, J., Späte, U., Ersoy, U., Joe, M., Sedaghat, L., & Stashenko, P. (2004). Serotonin regulates osteoclast differentiation through its transporter. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 19(9), 1420–1431. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.040606
Berbel, L. O., Banczek, E. D. P., Karoussis, I. K., Kotsakis, G. A., & Costa, I. (2019). Determinants of corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy dental implants in an in vitro model of peri-implant inflammation. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210530
Boffano, P., Brucoli, M., & Rocchetti, V. (2024). Corrosion features of titanium alloys in dental implants: A systematic review. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02169-6
Dhaliwal, J. S., David, S. R. N., Zulhilmi, N. R., Dhaliwal, S. K. S., Knights, J., & de Albuquerque Júnior, R. F. (2020). Contamination of titanium dental implants: A narrative review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2810-4
Hämmerle, C. H. F., Cordaro, L., van Assche, N., Benic, G. I., Bornstein, M. M., Gamper, F., Gotfredsen, K., … Wismeijer, D. (2015). Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry: Summary and consensus statements of the 4th EAO consensus conference 2015. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26 (Suppl. 11), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12648
Kopic, S., & Geibel, J. P. (2013). Gastric acid, calcium absorption, and their impact on bone health. Physiological Reviews, 93(1), 189–268. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00015.2012
Makary, C., Menhall, A., Lahoud, P., An, H. W., Park, K. B., & Traini, T. (2023). Nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface compared to machined and SLA dental implants—A split-mouth randomized case/double-control histological human study. Nanomaterials, 13(2), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020357
Mtanis, T., Biadsee, A., & Ormianer, Z. (2023). Assessing the cleanliness of dental implants using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis: A SEM and EDS in vitro study. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 14(3), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14030172
Mendes, G. N., Floresta, L. G., Takeshita, W. M., Brasileiro, B. F., & Trento, C. L. (2025). The application of ImageJ software for roughness analysis of dental implants. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, 38(3), 1812–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01298-1
Pardal-Peláez, B., Flores-Fraile, J., Pardal-Refoyo, J. L., & Montero, J. (2021). Implant loss and crestal bone loss in early loading versus delayed and immediate loading in edentulous mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 13(4), e397–e405. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57966
