IMPACT OF PREANALYTICAL FACTORS ON THE ACCURACY OF LABORATORY RESULTS

Authors

  • Gorica Stoilevska Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, North Macedonia
  • Danijela Janicevic Ivanovska Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delchev University, Shtip, North Macedonia

Keywords:

Preanalytical phase, Laboratory diagnostics, Hemolysis, Sample transport, Quality control, Errors, Patient safety

Abstract

The preanalytical phase represents the most complex and error prone segment of the laboratory diagnostic process. It encompasses all procedures occurring before the analytical measurement itself, including patient preparation, correct sample collection, identification, transport, and storage of biological specimens. Errors during this phase can significantly compromise the accuracy of laboratory results and lead to inappropriate clinical decisions. This paper provides a critical analysis of each step in the preanalytical process, identifies common sources of error, and proposes strategies for their prevention. The aim is to emphasize the importance of standardization, education, and quality control as essential tools for improving patient safety and diagnostic effectiveness.

References

Benati, M., Pighi, L., Paviati, E., Visconti, S., Lippi, G., & Salvagno, G. L. (2024). Preanalytical impact of incomplete K₂EDTA blood tube filling in molecular biology testing. Diagnostics, 14(17), 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171934.

Bliziotis, N. G., Kluijtmans, L. A. J., Tinnevelt, G. H., Reel, P., Reel, S., Langton, K., Robledo, M., Pamporaki, C., Pecori, A., Van Kralingen, J., Tetti, M., Engelke, U. F. H., Erlic, Z., Engel, J., Deutschbein, T., Nölting, S., Prejbisz, A., Richter, S., Adamski, J., … Timmers, H. J. L. M. (2022). Preanalytical pitfalls in untargeted plasma nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics of endocrine hypertension. Metabolites, 12(8), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080679.

Carraro, E., & Plebani, R. (2007). Errors in a stat laboratory: Types and frequencies 10 years later. Clinical Chemistry, 53(7), 1338‑1342.

Da Rin, G. L. (2009). Pre‑analytical workstations: A tool for reducing laboratory errors. Clinica Chimica Acta, 404(1), 68‑74.

Evaluation of preanalytical and postanalytical phases in clinical biochemistry laboratory according to IFCC laboratory errors and patient safety specifications. Zorbozan, N., & Orçun Zorbozan, et al. (2022). Biochemia Medica, 32(3), 357‑365. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2022.030701.

From errors to excellence: the pre‑analytical journey to improved quality in diagnostics. A scoping review. (2024). Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm‑2024‑1277.

Giuseppe Lippi, Mattiuzzi, C., & Favaloro, E. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the pre‑analytical phase: State‑of‑the art and future perspectives. Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 42, 1‑10. https://doi.org/10.5937/jomb0‑45936.

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 15189:2022 Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO.

Lippi, M., Becan‑McBride, K., Behúlová, K., Bowen, A., Church, G., & Delanghe, M. (2013).

Plebani, R. (2006). Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 44(6), 750‑759.

Pre‑analytical quality improvement: From dream to reality. Lippi, M., Banfi, G., Church, G., Cornes, B. M., Grankvist, S., & Guidi, G. (2011). Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 49(7), 1113‑1126.

Preanalytical quality improvement: In quality we trust. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 51(1), 229‑241.

Sciacovelli, M., O’Kane, A., Skaik, F., Caciagli, M., Pellegrini, C., & Plebani, R. (2017). Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: From theory to practice. Biochemia Medica, 27(3), 321‑335.

Status of pre‑analytical quality management of laboratory tests at primary clinics in Korea. (2022). Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 43(5), 493‑502.

Stephan, C., Kalomeris, T., Li, Y., Kubiak, J., Racine‑Brzostek, S., SahBandar, I., Zhao, Z., Cushing, M. M., & Yang, H. S. (2025). Preanalytical considerations of handling suspected Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease specimens within the clinical pathology laboratories: A survey‑based approach. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010204.

World Health Organization. (2010). WHO Guidelines on Drawing Blood: Best Practices in Phlebotomy. Geneva: WHO Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-06

How to Cite

Stoilevska, G., & Janicevic Ivanovska, D. (2025). IMPACT OF PREANALYTICAL FACTORS ON THE ACCURACY OF LABORATORY RESULTS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 72(4), 529–535. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/7854

Most read articles by the same author(s)