PRAGMATIC-DISCURSIVE COMPETENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING – THEORETICAL OVERVIEW AND CRITICAL REFLECTION
Keywords:
pragmatic-discursive competence, grammatical competence, foreign language teaching, communicationAbstract
The aim of this paper is to discuss certain aspects of fostering pragmatic-discursive competence in foreign language teaching. The concepts of pragmatic and discursive competence in foreign language education are examined, whose development gained greater focus with the emergence of the communicative approach in the 1970s. The study is based on the communicative paradigm and the concept of communicative competence, analyzing their influence on contemporary didactics. It is emphasized that, despite the significant progress of subdisciplines such as pragmalinguistics, sociolinguistics, and conversational linguistics, their application in teaching remains limited. Special attention is given to the interrelationship between grammatical and pragmatic-discursive competence, whereby grammar is understood as an interactional phenomenon that includes the illocutionary and perlocutionary aspects of speech. Through the example of linguistic politeness—considered both a pragmatic and a discursive phenomenon—it is shown that in foreign language instruction at philological faculties, more than in other educational and artistic contexts, greater attention should be paid to language use (parole) and to the transmission of pragmatic and discursive knowledge and skills related to this phenomenon. In this context, the paper analyzes how communicative awareness and pragmatic-discursive competence can be encouraged in foreign language teaching within the field of philological studies.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Cambridge.
Becker-Mrotzek, M. (2007). Gesprächskompetenz vermitteln und ermitteln: Gute Aufgaben im Bereich Sprechen und Zuhören: http://www.uni-koeln.de/ewfak/Deutsch/materialien/mbm/BeckerMrotzek Gespraechskompetenz _vermitteln_und_ermitteln_082007.pdf (13.7.2025).
Becker-Mrotzek, M. (2009). Mündliche Kommunikationskompetenz. In: Becker-Mrotzek, Michel (ed.): Mündliche Kommunikation und Gesprächsdidaktik. Baltmannsweiler, 66-83.
Becker-Mrotzek, M., & Brünner, G. (eds.) (2004). Analyse und Vermittlung von Gesprächskompetenzt: http://www.verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2004/kompetenz/ kompetenz.pdf (13.7.2011).
Berdychowska, Z. (2004). Was erwarten wir von der Grammatikvermittlung im Germanistikstudium? In: Engel, Ulrich (ed.): Sprachwissen in der Hochschulgermanistik. Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Bonn, 9-19.
Fatmawati, F., & Ningsih, R. (2024). Politeness in Expressive Speech Acts: A Cyber Pragmatics Approach. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1721–1738. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.12620
Habermas, J. (1971). Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz. In: Habermas, Jürgen / Luhmann, Niklas (eds.): Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Was leitet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt (M.), 101-141.
Haugh, M. (2024). (Im)politeness as object, (im)politeness as perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, 20(1), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2023-0082
Helbig, G. (1992). Wieviel Grammatik braucht der Mensch? In: Deutsch als Fremdsprache 3:150-155.
Hessky, R. (1994). Der Sprachvergleich als Hilfe beim Grammatiklernen. In: Deutsch als Fremdsprache 1:20-25.
House, J. (1983). Learning to talk. Talking to learn. Eine Untersuchung des Lernerverhaltens in zwei verschiedenen Diskurstypen. In: Heid, Manfred (ed.): New Yorker Werkstattgespräch 1982. München, 158-179.
House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: routines and metapragmatic awareness. In: Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18:225-252.
House, J. (1997). Kommunikative Bewusstheit und Fremdsprachenlernen. In: Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (FLuL) 26:68-87.
House, J. (2000). Interaktion und Fremdsprachenunterricht. In: Bausch, Karl-Richard / Christ, Herbert / Königs, Frank, G. / Krumm, Hans-Jürgen (eds.): Interaktion im Kontext des Lehrens und Lernens fremder Sprachen. Tübingen, 111-118.
House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Zur Rolle der Kognition in Kommunikationskursen. In: Die neueren Sprachen 1:42-55.
Hymes, D. (1966). On communicative competence. Paper originally read at the Research Planning Conference on Language Development among Disadvantaged Children. Yeshiva.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In: Pride, John Bernhard / Holmes, Janet (eds.): Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth, 269-293.
Jucker, A. (2020). Politeness in the history of English. From the Middle Ages to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, D.Z., & House, J. (2021). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Karafoti, E. (2021). Negotiating preferred norms in requests and offers: Is the (dis)preferred answer so obviously (im)polite? Journal of Pragmatics 173. 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.07.010.
Kiesling, S.F. (2022). Stance and stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics 8. 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256
Lüger, H. (ed.) (2001). Höflichkeitsstile. Frankfurt (M.).
Meibauer, J. (1999). Pragmatik. Eine Einführung.Tübingen.
Schmenck, B. (2007). Kommunikation ist alles? Oder? Wider die Trivialisierung des Kommunikativen im kommunikativen Fremdsprachenunterricht. In: Deutsch als Fremdsprache 3:131-139.
Thurmair, M. (2004). Übungsgrammatiken im Kontext textgrammatischer Ansätze. In: Kühn, Peter (ed.): Übungsgrammatiken Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Linguistische Analysen und didaktische Konzepte. Regensburg, 79-102.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. London.
