CHINESE AS A THIRD LANGUAGE: BIH TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON LINGUISTIC INTERFERENCE, LEARNING DIFFICULTIES, AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Jelena Nikolić University of East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Keywords:

Chinese as a third language, third language acquisition, language interference, teacher perspectives, Chinese language pedagogy

Abstract

This paper examines the learning and teaching of Chinese as a third language (L3) in Bosnia and Herzegovina from the perspective of Chinese language teachers, with particular attention to cross linguistic influence, learning difficulties, motivational factors, and didactic practices. Anchored in contemporary Third Language Acquisition (TLA) theory, the study draws on recent key insights and recent empirical research highlighting the dynamic and non linear interaction between previously acquired languages and additional language learning. The empirical component combines semi structured questionnaires with Chinese language teachers working in higher education and secondary education contexts in BiH including institutional settings such as university sinology departments and Confucius Institutes with a learner corpus consisting of students’ written assignments produced across different proficiency levels. By combining teacher perspectives with corpus based evidence, the study seeks to provide an empirically grounded account of the specific challenges and pedagogical implications associated with teaching Chinese as an L3 in a multilingual European context. Qualitative thematic analysis of teacher interviews reveals recurring challenges related to negative transfer from students’ first language (Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian) and dominant second languages (primarily English), particularly in the domains of syntax, lexical selection, word order, and the use of function words. Corpus based analysis corroborates these perceptions by identifying systematic error patterns attributable to cross linguistic interference, limited metalinguistic awareness, and insufficient exposure to authentic input. Teachers further highlight motivational fluctuations linked to the perceived difficulty of Chinese orthography, tonal pronunciation, and delayed communicative payoff, as well as institutional constraints affecting curriculum design and instructional time. The findings are interpreted within recent TLA models that view multilingual competence as a dynamic and non linear system, shaped by typological distance, proficiency asymmetries, and instructional context. The paper argues that targeted pedagogical interventions such as contrastive awareness raising, strategic use of previously acquired languages, corpus informed feedback, and motivation sensitive task design can significantly enhance learning outcomes. The study concludes with practical implications for improving Chinese language teaching in Bosnia and Herzegovina and contributes to the broader European discussion on multilingual education and less commonly taught languages.

References

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

Cai, Y. (2022). Confucius Institutes as a platform for promoting intercultural communication: Case study of the Confucius Institute at the University of Banja Luka. Društvo i politika, 3(3), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.7251/fpndp2203077c

Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000218

Chan, J., Woore, R., Molway, L., & Mutton, T. (2022). Learning and teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A scoping review. Review of Education, 10(3), e3370. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3370

De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.

Gong, Y. F., & Lai, C. (2024). Editorial: Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign or second language: The educational psychology perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1333836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333836

Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414

Guo, Y. (2025). Revisiting the L2 factor in third language acquisition: A brief literature review. Iris Journal of Educational Research, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.33552/IJER.2025.04.000594

Hammarberg, B. (2009). Processes in third language acquisition. Edinburgh University Press.

Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh University Press.

Luan, X., Kuno, M., Sugawara, A., Kawasaki, Y., & Sugimori, E. (2024). The effect of previously acquired languages on third language acquisition. Heliyon, 10(4), e26202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26202

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12

How to Cite

Nikolić, J. (2026). CHINESE AS A THIRD LANGUAGE: BIH TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON LINGUISTIC INTERFERENCE, LEARNING DIFFICULTIES, AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 74(2), 311–316. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/8097