POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR NORTH MACEDONIA AND KOSOVO OF THE DELAY IN MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

  • Gani Rashiti Law Faculty, UKLO, Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Abdulla Azizi Faculty of Contemporary Social Sciences, SEEU, North Macedonia

Keywords:

EU enlargement, North Macedonia, Kosovo, European integration

Abstract

The European integration process of the Western Balkans (WB) represents one of the strategic priorities of the European Union (EU) for the stability, security and democratic development of the region. However, the continuous delay of membership and the lack of a clear time perspective have raised important dilemmas regarding the effectiveness and credibility of this process. This paper aims to assess the European integration process of the two neighbouring countries of the Western Balkans, placing it in the context of the delay of EU membership. The methodology of the study is based on the qualitative analysis of official EU documents, reports of international institutions, SWOT analysis and contemporary academic literature. The results show that, despite the symbolic progress of the above-mentioned countries in the harmonization of laws and few institutional reforms, the European integration process is facing structural weaknesses such as the lack of administrative capacities, the politicization of institutions and the decline of public trust. The delay in accession itself creates serious threats, including rising Euroscepticism, an exodus of human capital, and the growing influence of external actors in the region. Moreover, the lack of clear EU support for resolving the two countries’ neighbouring disputes has weakened the motivation for deep reforms and contributed to the politicisation of reforms and the emergence of weaknesses in the rule of law and weak institutional capacities. The article concludes that a more proactive EU approach to enlargement through unstinting support for the path of North Macedonia and Kosovo would also encourage the process of genuine reforms and restore citizens’ trust in the EU, while the EU integration process would be seen as a reality rather than an unattainable dream for them.

References

Bieber, F. (2018). East European Politics, 34(3), 337–354.

Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2018). Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 83–108.

European Commission. (2019). Country report: North Macedonia. Brussels.

European Commission. (2023). EU Enlargement Policy Report.

European Commission. (2023a). Kosovo report 2023. Brussels.

European Commission. (2023b). North Macedonia report 2023. Brussels.

Freedom House. (2023). Nations in transit 2023: The new era of authoritarianism. Washington, DC.

Grabbe, H. (2014). Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(S1), 40–56.

Noutcheva, G. (2020). West European Politics, 43(4), 727–746.

Sharlamanov, K., & Jovanoski, A. (2013). The Ethnic Relations in the Macedonian Society Measured Through the Concept of Affective Social Distance. American International Journal of Social Science 2(3): 33-39.

Sharlamanov, K., & Jovanoski, A. (2012). The multiculturalism in Republic of Macedonia, observed through the perceptions for the symbols of the other ethnic groups: Framework of the symbolic interactionism. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 (23): 64–70.

World Bank. (2022). Western Balkans Regular Economic Report.

World Bank. (2023). Migration and remittances data. Washington, DC.

World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC.

World Bank. (2023). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Washington, DC.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Rashiti, G., & Azizi, A. (2026). POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR NORTH MACEDONIA AND KOSOVO OF THE DELAY IN MEMBERSHIP IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 75(6), 699–705. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/8235