AGE-SPECIFIC DISTRIBUTION OF HPV GENOTYPES IN WOMEN FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA
Keywords:
human papillomavirus, genotype, age distribution, cervical screening, risk stratificationAbstract
Patient age is a well recognised determinant of both the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and the probability of cytological progression, however, the majority of investigations address this relationship only at the level of the broad distinction between single- and multiple-type infection, and the age distribution of individual genotypes remains insufficiently characterised. The present study was undertaken to address this question among HPV-positive women identified through primary cervical screening. The investigation was conducted at the Centre for Public Health Bitola between February 2019 and August 2023. Three hundred women positive for human papillomavirus were tested for twenty-one genotypes by real-time polymerase chain reaction and stratified by cytology into a normal finding, low-risk lesions and high-risk lesions. For each genotype, the mean age of carriers and non-carriers was compared, and the distribution of carriers across five age groups was assessed. Mean age increased significantly with lesion severity, from 31.1 years in the normal group to 35.1 in low-risk and 37.1 in high-risk lesions (p = 0.000112). At the genotype level, statistically significant age signatures were identified. Several genotypes occurred more frequently among the youngest women: type 73 carriers had a mean age of 28.3 years, with 59.1% aged 24 or younger (p < 0.0001); type 82 was likewise more frequent in this age group (54.5% aged ≤ 24; p = 0.0018); and types 59 and 53 also demonstrated significant age structures. In contrast, type 31 carriers were significantly older, and type 68 carriers were over-represented in the 55-to-64 age group (p = 0.012). Type 16 showed a significant age-group distribution (p = 0.04) but no significant difference in mean age, whereas type 18 exhibited no age preference. These reproducible genotype-specific age signatures indicate that certain genotypes behave as transient infections of younger women while others persist into older age. It is recommended that genotype-resolved, age-aware interpretation be incorporated into risk-stratification algorithms and into the determination of screening intervals, so that individual genotypes are weighted according to their age profile and oncogenic potential rather than treated as equivalent. The present analysis is based on results derived from a doctoral dissertation and contributes region-specific data from southwestern North Macedonia, where such genotype-resolved age data have not previously been reported.
References
Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834
Bruni, L., Albero, G., Serrano, B., Mena, M., Collado, J. J., Gómez, D., et al. (2023). Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Republic of North Macedonia: Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. http://www.hpvcentre.net
Donnikov, A. E., Markelov, M. I., Pestrikova, T. Yu., Yurasova, E. A., Kotelnikova, A. V., & Voroshilina, E. S. (2019). Analysis of the prevalence and viral load of different human papillomavirus types in the regions of the Russian Federation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, (4), 39–48.
Iacobone, A. D., Bottari, F., Radice, D., Preti, E. P., Franchi, D., Vidal Urbinati, A. M., et al. (2021). Distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes and multiple infections in preneoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions. Cancer Medicine, 10(8), 2742–2750. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3862
Kovacic, M. B., Castle, P. E., Herrero, R., Schiffman, M., Sherman, M. E., Wacholder, S., et al. (2006). Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality. Cancer Research, 66(20), 10112–10119. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1426
Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., De Sanjosé, S., Herrero, R., Castellsagué, X., Shah, K. V., et al. (2003). Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(6), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021641
Onon, T. S. (2011). History of human papillomavirus, warts and cancer: What do we know today? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 25(5), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.04.001
Salazar, K. L., Zhou, H. S., Xu, J., Peterson, L. E., Schwartz, M. R., Mody, D. R., et al. (2015). Multiple human papillomavirus infections and their impact on the development of high-risk cervical lesions. Acta Cytologica, 59(5), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442512
Schiffman, M., Doorbar, J., Wentzensen, N., De Sanjosé, S., Fakhry, C., Monk, B. J., et al. (2016). Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2, 16086. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.86
Tekkesin, N., Goktas, S., Alkis, V., Koc, S., Gurbuz, T., & Goktas, P. (2022). Analysis of the prevalence and quantification of viral load of different human papillomavirus types in Turkish women population. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 23(12), 4347–4355. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4347
Trottier, H., Mahmud, S., Costa, M. C., Sobrinho, J. P., Duarte-Franco, E., Rohan, T. E., et al. (2006). Human papillomavirus infections with multiple types and risk of cervical neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 15(7), 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0129
Vaccarella, S., Franceschi, S., Herrero, R., Schiffman, M., Rodriguez, A. C., Hildesheim, A., et al. (2011). Clustering of multiple human papillomavirus infections in women from a population-based study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 204(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir286
