AGE-SPECIFIC DISTRIBUTION OF HPV GENOTYPES IN WOMEN FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

Authors

  • Elena Krstevska-Kelepurovska Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Jasmina Nikolovska Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Angela Delova Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Svetlana Popovska Kljuseva Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Emilija Jashovic Siveska PHO Medihelp Bitola, University "St. Kliment Ohridski" Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Maja Belevska Clinical Hospital "Dr. Trifun Panovski" Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Ilija Kelepurovski Clinical Hospital "Dr. Trifun Panovski" Bitola, North Macedonia

Keywords:

human papillomavirus, genotype, age distribution, cervical screening, risk stratification

Abstract

Patient age is a well recognised determinant of both the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and the probability of cytological progression, however, the majority of investigations address this relationship only at the level of the broad distinction between single- and multiple-type infection, and the age distribution of individual genotypes remains insufficiently characterised. The present study was undertaken to address this question among HPV-positive women identified through primary cervical screening. The investigation was conducted at the Centre for Public Health Bitola between February 2019 and August 2023. Three hundred women positive for human papillomavirus were tested for twenty-one genotypes by real-time polymerase chain reaction and stratified by cytology into a normal finding, low-risk lesions and high-risk lesions. For each genotype, the mean age of carriers and non-carriers was compared, and the distribution of carriers across five age groups was assessed. Mean age increased significantly with lesion severity, from 31.1 years in the normal group to 35.1 in low-risk and 37.1 in high-risk lesions (p = 0.000112). At the genotype level, statistically significant age signatures were identified. Several genotypes occurred more frequently among the youngest women: type 73 carriers had a mean age of 28.3 years, with 59.1% aged 24 or younger (p < 0.0001); type 82 was likewise more frequent in this age group (54.5% aged ≤ 24; p = 0.0018); and types 59 and 53 also demonstrated significant age structures. In contrast, type 31 carriers were significantly older, and type 68 carriers were over-represented in the 55-to-64 age group (p = 0.012). Type 16 showed a significant age-group distribution (p = 0.04) but no significant difference in mean age, whereas type 18 exhibited no age preference. These reproducible genotype-specific age signatures indicate that certain genotypes behave as transient infections of younger women while others persist into older age. It is recommended that genotype-resolved, age-aware interpretation be incorporated into risk-stratification algorithms and into the determination of screening intervals, so that individual genotypes are weighted according to their age profile and oncogenic potential rather than treated as equivalent. The present analysis is based on results derived from a doctoral dissertation and contributes region-specific data from southwestern North Macedonia, where such genotype-resolved age data have not previously been reported.

Author Biographies

Elena Krstevska-Kelepurovska, Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia

Department of Microbiology

Jasmina Nikolovska, Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia

Department of Microbiology

Angela Delova, Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia

Department of Microbiology

Svetlana Popovska Kljuseva, Centre for Public Health Bitola, North Macedonia

Department of Epidemiology

Maja Belevska, Clinical Hospital "Dr. Trifun Panovski" Bitola, North Macedonia

Department of Ophthalmology

Ilija Kelepurovski, Clinical Hospital "Dr. Trifun Panovski" Bitola, North Macedonia

Department of Urology

References

Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834

Bruni, L., Albero, G., Serrano, B., Mena, M., Collado, J. J., Gómez, D., et al. (2023). Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Republic of North Macedonia: Summary report. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. http://www.hpvcentre.net

Donnikov, A. E., Markelov, M. I., Pestrikova, T. Yu., Yurasova, E. A., Kotelnikova, A. V., & Voroshilina, E. S. (2019). Analysis of the prevalence and viral load of different human papillomavirus types in the regions of the Russian Federation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, (4), 39–48.

Iacobone, A. D., Bottari, F., Radice, D., Preti, E. P., Franchi, D., Vidal Urbinati, A. M., et al. (2021). Distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes and multiple infections in preneoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions. Cancer Medicine, 10(8), 2742–2750. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3862

Kovacic, M. B., Castle, P. E., Herrero, R., Schiffman, M., Sherman, M. E., Wacholder, S., et al. (2006). Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality. Cancer Research, 66(20), 10112–10119. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1426

Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., De Sanjosé, S., Herrero, R., Castellsagué, X., Shah, K. V., et al. (2003). Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(6), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021641

Onon, T. S. (2011). History of human papillomavirus, warts and cancer: What do we know today? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 25(5), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.04.001

Salazar, K. L., Zhou, H. S., Xu, J., Peterson, L. E., Schwartz, M. R., Mody, D. R., et al. (2015). Multiple human papillomavirus infections and their impact on the development of high-risk cervical lesions. Acta Cytologica, 59(5), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442512

Schiffman, M., Doorbar, J., Wentzensen, N., De Sanjosé, S., Fakhry, C., Monk, B. J., et al. (2016). Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2, 16086. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.86

Tekkesin, N., Goktas, S., Alkis, V., Koc, S., Gurbuz, T., & Goktas, P. (2022). Analysis of the prevalence and quantification of viral load of different human papillomavirus types in Turkish women population. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 23(12), 4347–4355. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4347

Trottier, H., Mahmud, S., Costa, M. C., Sobrinho, J. P., Duarte-Franco, E., Rohan, T. E., et al. (2006). Human papillomavirus infections with multiple types and risk of cervical neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 15(7), 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0129

Vaccarella, S., Franceschi, S., Herrero, R., Schiffman, M., Rodriguez, A. C., Hildesheim, A., et al. (2011). Clustering of multiple human papillomavirus infections in women from a population-based study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 204(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir286

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Krstevska-Kelepurovska, E., Nikolovska, J., Delova, A., Popovska Kljuseva, S., Jashovic Siveska, E., Belevska, M., & Kelepurovski, I. (2026). AGE-SPECIFIC DISTRIBUTION OF HPV GENOTYPES IN WOMEN FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 77(4), 293–297. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/8473

Most read articles by the same author(s)