BEEP TEST: ORIGIN AND APPLICATION IN CONTEMPORARY SPORTS PRACTICE
Keywords:
Beep test, shuttle run, aerobic capacity, VO₂max, validity, sports practiceAbstract
The assessment of aerobic capacity is a fundamental element of functional diagnostics in sports science and practice. The maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) is considered the “gold standard” for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness, but laboratory-based measurements are costly, require specialized equipment, and are not always feasible in large groups of athletes. To address this limitation, field-based protocols such as the 20-meter multistage shuttle run test (commonly known as the Beep test) have been developed and widely applied. The aim of the present review is to summarize the historical development, predictive equations, validity, reliability, and adaptations of the Beep test, and to highlight its application in contemporary sports practice. A literature review was conducted including both classical publications and recent validation studies. The analysis shows that the Beep test is valid and reliable for large-scale group screening and monitoring, particularly in student and endurance athlete populations, but results may vary depending on the sport and the predictive formula applied. In basketball and rowing, systematic under- or overestimation of VO₂max has been reported, while in female team sports only selected predictive equations provide accurate results. Modified protocols, such as 10-meter versions and child-specific adaptations, expand the usability of the test, and recent work demonstrates that even different sound signals can influence performance and enjoyment. The review concludes that the Beep test remains a practical and cost-effective tool for assessing aerobic fitness; however, practitioners should interpret results with caution and in relation to sport specificity. For precise individual diagnostics and training prescription, it is recommended to combine the Beep test with portable gas analysis systems, which provide direct measurement of gas exchange. This combined approach is particularly relevant for intermittent sports and combat disciplines such as taekwondo, where the accuracy of physiological assessment is essential. Furthermore, the review emphasizes that the Beep test holds value not only in elite sport, but also in physical education, clinical exercise settings, and population health monitoring, where quick and inexpensive assessment of aerobic fitness is required. By consolidating evidence from different populations and protocols, the present analysis provides guidance for coaches, physiotherapists, and sports physicians on how to apply and interpret the Beep test effectively in both research and practice. Future research should focus on refining predictive equations for specific sports and age groups, as well as exploring digital and sensor-based integrations that may further enhance the precision and usability of the Beep test in modern sports diagnostics.
References
Aertssen, W. F. M., van de Kamp, A., Jelsma, L. D., & Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M. (2024). Reliability and validity of the modified shuttle test-Paeds to measure cardiorespiratory fitness in children. BMC Pediatrics, 24(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04812-0
Aziz, A. R., Tan, F. H., & Teh, K. C. (2005). A pilot study comparing multistage shuttle run test and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test in soccer players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 4(2), 105–112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3880877/
Bransford, D. R., & Howley, E. T. (1977). Oxygen cost of running in trained and untrained men and women. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology, 43(6), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1977.43.6.971
Chatterjee, P., Banerjee, A. K., Das, P., Debnath, P., & Chatterjee, P. (2008). Validity of 20 meter multi stage shuttle run test for prediction of maximum oxygen uptake in Indian female university students. Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ), 6(2), 176–180. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18769082/
Chatterjee, P., Banerjee, A. K., Majumdar, P., & Chatterjee, P. (2006). Validity of the 20-m multistage shuttle run test for the prediction of VO₂max in junior Taekwondo players of India. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 18(1), 1–7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261144318
Cho, H.-L., Park, H.-Y., & Nam, S.-S. (2022). Development of a multistage 10-m shuttle run test for VO₂max estimation in healthy adults. Journal of Men’s Health, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31083/jomh.2021.066
Flouris, A. D., Metsios, G. S., & Koutedakis, Y. (2005). Enhancing the efficacy of the 20 m multistage shuttle run test. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(3), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.012658
Ketelhut, S., Benzing, V., & Hug, D. (2025). From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment. Journal of Sports Sciences, 43(15), 1462–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898
Léger, L. A., & Lambert, J. (1982). A maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test to predict VO₂max. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 49(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428958
Léger, L. A., Mercier, D., Gadoury, C., & Lambert, J. (1988). The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. Journal of Sports Sciences, 6(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418808729800
Léger, L., & Boucher, R. (1980). An indirect continuous running multistage field test: The Université de Montréal Track Test. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 5(2), 77–84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7389053/
Magee, M. K., White, J. B., Merrigan, J. J., & Jones, M. T. (2021). Does the multistage 20-m shuttle run test accurately predict VO₂max in NCAA Division I women collegiate field hockey athletes? Sports, 9(6), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9060079
Margaria, R., Cerretelli, P., Aghemo, P., & Sassi, G. (1963). Energy cost of running. Journal of Applied Physiology, 18(2), 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1963.18.2.367
Mayorga-Vega, D., Aguilar-Soto, P., & Viciana, J. (2015). Criterion-related validity of the 20-m shuttle run test for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14(3), 536–547. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4541117/
Paradisis, G. P., Zacharogiannis, E., Mandila, D., Smirtiotou, A., Argeitaki, P., & Cooke, C. B. (2014). Multi-stage 20-m shuttle run fitness test, maximal oxygen uptake and velocity at maximal oxygen uptake. Journal of Human Kinetics, 41(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2014-0036
Ramsbottom, R., Brewer, J., & Williams, C. (1988). A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 22(4), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.22.4.141
Senanayake, S., Peiris, W., Rathnayake, R., et al. (2024). Validation study to assess the concurrent validity of the Beep test as a proxy for cardiopulmonary endurance using VO₂max as the criterion standard in rowers. European Journal of Sport Science, 24(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2024.3.1.131
St Clair Gibson, A., Broomhead, S., Lambert, M. I., & Hawley, J. A. (1998). Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from a 20-m shuttle run as measured directly in runners and squash players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 16(4), 331–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419808559361
Stojanovic, M. D., Calleja-Gonzalez, J., Mikic, M., & Ostojic, S. M. (2016). Accuracy and criterion-related validity of the 20-m shuttle run test in well-trained young basketball players. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.2016.08.00
