INCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC AND ARTISTIC ENVIRONMENT. THEORETICAL MODEL AND APPLIED STRATEGIES

Authors

  • Vesela Kazashka Academy of Music, Dance and Fine Arts 'Prof. Asen Diamandiev' – Plovdiv, Bulgaria
  • Tsvetomira Kazashka Academy of Music, Dance and Fine Arts 'Prof. Asen Diamandiev' – Plovdiv, Bulgaria
  • Kiril Velchev Academy of Music, Dance and Fine Arts 'Prof. Asen Diamandiev' – Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Keywords:

Social Inclusion, Creative Environments, Urban Transformation

Abstract

This article explores the connections between culture, art, climate change, and social issues, analyzing their impact on artistic creativity in the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Plovdiv, one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in Europe, was designated as the European Capital of Culture in 2019. The city’s transformation focuses on establishing it as a European cultural, ecological, and smart city. This evolutionary process is based on a combination of traditions and the development of new contemporary models rooted in science, ecology, and inclusion.
The article presents successful practices that highlight the role of art in improving the quality of life and promoting inclusion, while simultaneously advocating for environmental preservation and the return to ecological habitats for urban residents. Additionally, it explores the development of inclusive environments outside of traditional settings for creative and scientific endeavors.

Author Biography

Vesela Kazashka, Academy of Music, Dance and Fine Arts 'Prof. Asen Diamandiev' – Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology (CPSBB) – Plovdiv, Bulgaria

References

Campagnaro, C., Di Prima, N., & Ceraolo, S. (2021). Co-design and the collective creativity processes in care systems and places. Social Inclusion, 9(4), 130–142.

Caulfield, T., Bubela, T., Kimmelman, J., & Ravitsky, V. (2021). Let’s do better: Public representations of COVID-19 science. FACETS, 6, 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0018

Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Güngör, H., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2016). Different sides of a reality: “Positive stigma”. In Handbook of research on chaos and complexity theory in the social sciences (pp. 125–132). IGI Global.

Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 21, 198–233.

Hannes, K., & Laermans, R. (2020). Среща с артистични изследователски практики: Анализ на техните критични социални потенциали. Art/Research International: A Trans-disciplinary Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29533

Jackson, D. J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? (White paper). Arlington, VA: US National Science Foundation.

Livingston, V., Jackson-Nevels, B., Davis-Wagner, D., Jameson, D., & Joyner, C. (2025). Dignity in mental health—examining the dynamics of mental health stigma: A narrative review. Academia Mental Health and Well-Being, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.20935/MHealthWellB7837

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

Muñoz-Bellerín, M., & Cordero-Ramos, N. (2021). Citizen art and human rights: Collective theatre creation as a way of combatting exclusion. Social Inclusion, 9(4), 106–115.

Okete, W. (2024). Promoting inclusion in science communication through the infusion of art. The Biochemist, 46(3), 7–10.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12

How to Cite

Kazashka, V., Kazashka, T., & Velchev, K. (2026). INCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC AND ARTISTIC ENVIRONMENT. THEORETICAL MODEL AND APPLIED STRATEGIES. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 74(1), 221–225. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/8080