SUCCESSFUL CAREER DEVELOPMENT: FATEFUL VERSUS STRATEGIC DECISIONS

Authors

  • Mende Solunchevski International Slavic University, Sveti Nikole-Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Gabriela Krstevska International Slavic University, Sveti Nikole-Bitola, North Macedonia
  • Lidija Stefanovska BAS, Skopje-Bitola, North Macedonia

Keywords:

career development, fateful decisions, strategic decisions, decision-making, personal growth

Abstract

Background: Career development is often assumed to be the outcome of rational, long-term strategic planning. However, individual experiences frequently reveal the decisive role of seemingly spontaneous choices made in unpredictable situations. These "fateful decisions" challenge the dominant understanding that success follows exclusively from planned actions. The literature highlights the complexity of decision-making, yet offers limited insights into how individuals interpret and implement different types of career-related decisions over time.
Purpose: This paper aims to explore whether individuals perceive their career development as primarily shaped by strategic or fateful decisions. It also investigates how these decisions relate to key managerial functions in professional contexts.
Study design/methodology/approach: A structured survey was conducted with 113 participants from various professions and organizations in the Republic of North Macedonia. Respondents were asked to reflect on the types of decisions that most influenced their careers and how these decisions correspond with elements of managerial practice such as planning and organizing.
Findings/conclusions: The results indicate that fateful decisions—those made in response to unforeseen opportunities or turning points—are more commonly recognized as shaping career paths than strategic planning. A significant portion of participants also described alternating decision-making, influenced by a variety of external factors. Regardless of the decision type, most respondents associated their career implementation with planning and organizing functions, rather than with leadership or control activities.
Limitations/future research: The study is limited to self-reported perceptions within a specific national context and sample size. Future research could benefit from comparative studies across cultures and professions, as well as from longitudinal approaches that track career decision-making over time.
The aim of this paper is to explore which type of decision—strategic or fateful—is perceived as more influential in shaping individual career development. In addition, the study examines how such decisions are identified and interpreted within the context of management.

References

Fredmund, M.( 2019). Führen Leisten Leben: Wirksames Management für eine neue Welt. Campus Verlag.

Furman, P., & at.all. (2022). 2022 Global Talent Trends: The Reinvention of Company Culture. LinkedIn Talent Solutions.

Griffin, R. W. (2010) Principles of Management (Prevod).Kochani: Geneks.

Jones, Gareth R. & Jennifer M. George. (2016). Contemporary Management. Ninth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Krstevska, G. (2026).The art of change management in dynamic times, Soplje: KG.

Krstevska, G. & Solunchevski, M. (2025). Organizational Behavior. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of North Macedonia.

Krstevska, G. & Solunchevski, M. (2024). Management. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of North Macedonia.

Schermerhorn, J. R. (2014).n.d. Management (Prevod) Kochani: Geneks.

Solunchevski, M. & Vckov, L. (2026). Basics of Management. Bitola: Grafo Prom.

Solunchevski, M. & Vckov, L. (2019). Basics of Management, (internal script), Sveti Nikole: ISU.

Strategic Management: (2012).Evaluation and Execution.

Wall, S. (1995). The New Strategists. New York: Free Press.

Weihrich, H. & Koontz, H. (1994). Management: A Global Perspective (Prijevod). Zagreb: Mate.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02

How to Cite

Solunchevski, M., Krstevska, G., & Stefanovska, L. (2026). SUCCESSFUL CAREER DEVELOPMENT: FATEFUL VERSUS STRATEGIC DECISIONS. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 76(1), 15–21. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/8279