ORGANIZING THE COGNITIVE ENVIROMENT FOR SOLVING PROBLEMS IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Authors

  • Kalina Georgieva Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria

Keywords:

problem-solving environment design, STEM, engineering

Abstract

The article outlines the main difficulties in creating a learning environment through problem solving. The effectiveness of evaluating well and ill- structured problems with quantitative methods and the need for qualitative evaluation criteria are examined. Two leading aspects of Jonassen's concept of design of a constructivist environment through problem solving with a practical and pragmatic role in creating problem situations are presented - organizing the cognitive environment and regulating its difficulty. The components of the problem as a construct and the specificity of the well- and poorly structured environment are described. Emphasis is placed on the content of the main dimensions - structure and complexity, as well as on the characteristic stages in the process of designing the problem situation, shaping the problem space and regulating the objective difficulty of the problem. A model for problem-solving support is also considered as part of the design of the learning environment and a way to model its functional difficulty. Examples are proposed, illustrating well- and poorly structured problems, the possibilities of the structural auxiliary model to be combined with conceptually different procedural models. The role and importance of the cognitive environment for problem-solving in engineering as a field of the Technology and Entrepreneurship and STEM discipline are considered.

References

Витанов, Л. (2022). STEM обучение по технологии и предприемачество. София: Просвета – София, 138 с. ISBN 978 – 954 – 01 – 4229 – 6

Витанов, Л. (2022). Обучението по технологии и предприемачество. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“.

Cho, M. K., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Investigating Elementary Students' Problem Solving and Teacher Scaffolding in Solving an Ill-Structured Problem. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(4), 274-289.

Çibukçiu, B. (2025). The Impact of Constructivist Learning Environment on Students' Motivation in Primary School. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.

Hung, W. (2015). Problem-based learning: Conception, practice, and future. In Authentic problem solving and learning in the 21st century: Perspectives from Singapore and beyond (pp. 75-92). Singapore: Springer Singapore

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational technology research and development, 45(1), 65-94.

Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 95-119.

Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2015). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 1741.

Susilawati, E., Hamidah, I., Rustaman, N., & Liliawati, W. (2024). Problem solving learning in science education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 548-558.

Yadav, B. (2025). Reimagining Classrooms: Constructivist Approaches as Catalysts for Deeper Learning. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 2(4), 56-68.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

Georgieva, K. (2026). ORGANIZING THE COGNITIVE ENVIROMENT FOR SOLVING PROBLEMS IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal , 76(6), 785–792. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/8392